UDL is a framework I am more familiar with, as it has been discussed to various degrees in previous classes. The framework draws heavily from the curb-cut effect phenomena, where things that are developed with a specific demographic in mind end up being used by a much larger group than those it was designed for. In terms of education, the idea is that lessons and classes should be designed with the consideration for as many students and their unique needs and backgrounds as possible.

I feel that UDL and its three main principles (multiple means of expression, multiple means of action and expression, and multiple means of engagement) is very beneficial to all students and that it’s a great way to consider how to make education approachable for everyone. One thing I wonder about it is in terms of students who may have conflicting accessibility needs, when a method put in place that’s beneficial for most students actually impedes the learning of other students, and how to adjust without taking away from some students’ needs.